安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









TRY_INJECT:forrest
1. Lowered a bit some population growth sources in general as well.
2. Pop capacity gain from development fixed, overpopulated locations will now properly have the scaling negative population growth. Further increased their migration push, so that most population decrease will come from migration instead of starvation.
3. Increased migration attraction from towns and cities (and megalopolis etc), to further the rural -> city migration.
4. Now peace gives a small pop growth bonus (0.2%) and war gives the inverse.
5. Balanced a bit the population capacity and capacity increase from vegetation and climate. Anything that is not too cold or too hot should be closer.
5. Rural settlement building gives substantially less pop growth (from 1% to 0.3%)