安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









In the same aforementioned section, there should be solid explanation in the armor section about making armor weaker on the sides or also the front.
You could say: Make sides weaker by decreasing armor thickness (or also spam), and to make it weak enough to be penetrated by 2 AP (whatever low # AP).
I suggest against making it just 'Using tank cannon' because then people may make their sides be barely penned by tank cannons, not caring about angles. People who don't think of making sides weaker, may not know much about tanks in the first place.
Never in all of the time I have played has that been a bigger factor than being able to actually penetrate the bricks, and when it has it is because that area just has additional armor because it's composite messiness