安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









i mean, why not criticize them for using guns and reticles? (so original huh)
also, it's more of a cultural trope that multiplayer fps is stale. it's a huge playerbase playing fps the same as ever. however, it might get old for a human to play the same kind of fps videogame for years and decades. im not saying theres no grounds for the idea, but yeah, it comes off to me as a sign that someone may be doing - "i probably complain about so many things in simple, broad, unverified ways"
and again, i dont think you shouldn't complain about things you care about. that's why im commenting, right, im giving feedback to you
An unfinished game in not in Beta. Beta is a finished game undergoing testing for gamebreaking bugs.
An Alpha is an unfinished game.
A beta should be the full release with minus any bug fixes from bugs found as a result of the beta.
The term beta is a well-defined term, and a "beta" with less content than the release is just misusing the term.