安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









Cored: yep
Block building: un-angled bricks (generally best in armor and structural integrity but cannot replicate all shapes.)
Plate building: using plates with +2 angles (can achieve any shape of vehicle but cannot be as strong as block building do to need of connecting bricks.)
Advanced building: using both SHAPE of bricks and rotation in MAX 1 ANGLE (this is the most hardest of all of them since it requires precision and outside of the box thinking, however can achieve almost any shape while keeping the armor almost as strong as block building method)
(good example of this is grapyls abrams)
>Cored/OP: we all know what that is
>Battle mode standard: generally well made vehicles made to be meta in battle mode
>Realistic standard: generally vehicles that sacrifice armor and meta for realistic proportions and damage model
>Low brick/Conquest standard: self explanatory
i could go on and on and better categorize them but its bad practice to write essay in comments, either ask me or just look them up on workshop there is plenty examples from each
generally having whitelist with mix of them means that some vehicles will be bored-line useless next to others, like battle mode standard IFV might be able to stop main gun of a realistic tank from front, while being able to penetrate its front armor with its HMG.