安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









It'll go
Ranged: Tank (100% strength) attacks, damages Militia (100% -> 80%)
Close: Tank attacks Militia damages Militia
Militia attacks Tank, damages Tank
During the Close step the Militia goes in with 80% strength due to the damage taken during the Ranged step, but will the damage inflicted by the tank during the Close step further reduce the militia's strength during that same step?
It makes sense that a Close unit will take damage during Indirect and Ranged steps before they can attack (and become weaker), but could that Close unit take damage from another Close unit before they can attack?
If so, what determines the order?
Per the simulator, the latter.
Units get 1 attack per phase and will always prefer targets that have not been targeted (or been targeted the fewest times?) this phase. As a lower priority, they will prefer to hit low rank units.
But your artillery taking no more than 1 hit a round will still typically let them survive any winning combat.
15:30 is still 1:2
20:30 is 1:2