安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Glad it worked out!
I wanted to know why disabling cores would make the game run better (initial thought would be the opposite), so I did some research.
Here is a summary of my findings:
Old games or certain engines (even some newer games today) are optimized for single core performance. The steps JJJJ's provides simply turn off hyper threading (intel) or simultaneous multithreading (amd). Forcing the game to run the entire core, rather than a thread.
Note: the even numbers (including 0) are the actual cores, the odd numbers are the threads
JJJJ suggests to skip 0, reason being that core 0 is where the OS and background tasks run.
I have a ryzen 5 9600x so I checked the following cores 2,4,6,8,10.