安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









Not high on the priority list but I'll see what I can do.
"Also, the sector board randomizer misses half of the possible rotations of outermost sector. There are 8 possible rotations, not 4. (For example, neptune is always aligned to the left half of a sector board, never the right."
Odd, I'll take a look.
Will add expansion first, then go for fixing issues like that.
Automation is a difficult thing and requires more thought than one might think. The biggest problem comimg with it is: Where to draw the line? Players expect consistentcy. So they'd assume different levels of automation based on a few things they might notice in the first few minutes of their playthrough. So while moons might be automated, they might expect other things to be automated as well and forget or don't notice it not being automated.
I draw the line at Setup and some QoL features that make manual stuff quicker to do, such as moving the score marke or adding numbers to other numbers (income). These things you need to actively press, should not happen by accident.
I hope that makes sense.