Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem









my main suggestion is making Spain a vassal of France given that's what Napoleon's goal was after all with Spain
Avoiding a potential winter campaign by beginning the offensive in spring, thereby giving themselves more time before the harsh winter.
Secondly, focusing on the western part of Russia (the Baltics and Poland).
Thirdly, supporting the Decembrist movements (which began as early as 1810) and backing separatists in Ukraine dissatisfied with the abolition of the Hetmanate in 1764.
The key battles, in my view, would be the battle for Vilnius, the blockade of Riga, and the battle near Pskov, from where the French later directed their forces toward St. Petersburg.
The prolonged defense and eventual capture of Pskov would have marked a major defeat for the Russian Empire, as the city is located at the crossroads of important routes linking western regions to the capital.
Although Napoleon won the war, was it worth it given the heavy loss of soldiers?