安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
奖励
my main suggestion is making Spain a vassal of France given that's what Napoleon's goal was after all with Spain
Avoiding a potential winter campaign by beginning the offensive in spring, thereby giving themselves more time before the harsh winter.
Secondly, focusing on the western part of Russia (the Baltics and Poland).
Thirdly, supporting the Decembrist movements (which began as early as 1810) and backing separatists in Ukraine dissatisfied with the abolition of the Hetmanate in 1764.
The key battles, in my view, would be the battle for Vilnius, the blockade of Riga, and the battle near Pskov, from where the French later directed their forces toward St. Petersburg.
The prolonged defense and eventual capture of Pskov would have marked a major defeat for the Russian Empire, as the city is located at the crossroads of important routes linking western regions to the capital.
Although Napoleon won the war, was it worth it given the heavy loss of soldiers?