安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









I don't know what your point is 'if the terrain around doesn't yield any food'. I have very, very rarely had any trouble with food in my capital or in the surrounding area -- and at Deity or Immortal, you will certainly run up against happiness barriers before food becomes a problem, anyway. And you seem to be talking long-term growth, in which case it doesn't matter whether you get your granary on t20 or t80.
Granary is not useless, the +2 food is converted to production on the Settlers.
craigslist0874:
The second city starts with one pop and won't be able to build Settlers until it grows to two. Overall, the science bonus you get from 1-2 extra population is very small and isn't worth delaying your cities for, especially if that pushes back the NC. Your city will grow soon enough anyway.
If you really wanted fast science, I would push up the Caravan, as at higher levels they give 4-5 science apiece. But overall, it's more valuable to get an NC and as many well-placed cities as possible.
You say so many settlers in a row 'cripples' your capital because it doesn't allow enough buildings. What buildings? I see this argument all the time, but it rarely comes with specific suggestions. You only get one chances to set up your initial footprint for a civ game, so we prioritize that. Any buildings can come after that. You won't be seriously crippled by delaying a monument till Legalism or a Granary till t80.