安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
For example, the destruction of the being via flamethrower seems completely plausible to me.
Who's to say it's always been vulnerable when landing via a meteor? Additionally, the landscape beneath the being is made up of clearly hollow corridors.
It's completely plausible that fire would be effective shooting down these drier chutes (we see a big plume in the ending), especially if the mutagenic root fluid is no longer working.
It's stated in an epilogue journal that the mutagenic fluid no longer works after being separated from the root for more than a few minutes.
Perhaps killing the being effectively neutralizes the healing trees? In my opinion, there's no good reason to question the ending.
Alternatively, perhaps the Stranger did end up using the flamethrower in the Being's core... But it didn't kill it. Him collapsing and dreaming of what happened after could be just the same as going to sleep in the apartment. The being lives on, surviving the flamethrower attack
It's a very engaging take on the story. I like it a lot
Most (if not all) creatures of the darkwood are vulnerable to fire. Even the seemingly invincible creatures have vulnerable cores.
Military rescue after the burning is not inconsistent. People are much more open minded AFTER a potentially apocalyptic plague burns down, than before. Besides, this "rescue" most likely involves quarantines, health checkups, and sensible scientific scrutiny - it's not purely altruistic.