安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









I find it hard to believe that like A. Camo Trousers aren't as protective as Camo Shorts, which leave half your leg exposed....
And B. That made for purpose Camo, military trousers, built for outdoor / rough world usage, built for the military?! are not as protective as a pair of jeans!
Like, there's no reason that these numbers have to end with a 0 either, I'd be quite happy to see like....
Suit Trousers -15
Pants -15
Jeans -25
Baggy Jeans -28
Jean Shorts -22
Camo Trousers -30
Camo Shorts -27
Whatever! You know, I just think the protection numbers are really all over the place, and they really could be done better! :L
Anyway, rant over, I'm gonna give your mod a shot the now!
Keep up the good work!
Love You!
BB