Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése










perhaps i did something wrong. which is entirely possible cause its so many door models that don't even have the same animation names and order sometimes.
i should probably decompile all original doors again and carefully look over it all just to make sure i didn't break of mismatch something.
I could be entirely wrong though because I didn't look too deep into it. I was looking for a fix to transparency of a material stop working on some damaged door textures, but I just added this mod with a few things removed and it works because i was only planning on singelplayer atm.
given how this mod somehow breaks when playing online.
I wasn't aware i missed a model. It's been a while since i looked at this mod.
I could check up on my files, add the missing door, and maybe add nicer opening anims to the doors that support it. Cause come to think of it, i did make some anims for some doors but never bothered to finish it.
Could this be related to the mod is re-stating the door options defaults for the damaged version? or maybe its the difference in idle pos: raw and rot: raw64 for the damaged versions?
I bet it's because it's something players can interact with and messes with something that otherwise doesn't happen on their end (doors can be completely broken down with gunfire). I reckon if they were to download this, neither players will face any issues. Haven't tried that one tho.
So if anyone packs this along with the others in a large pak01_dit.vpk, they'd be silly.
I still don't know why that happens though.