安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









"I'm fine with those who cheat, but like I said, I wouldn't say that it would be considered completing the game."
okay? nobody asked. why make the comment in the first place? who even are you to pass judgement on the validity of someone elses playtime? these are digital action figures bro get off your fucking high horse.
And, you might be too young to have experienced it, but there was a time when grinding was not yet a common place game mechanic.
As explained in this article [www.inverse.com], "Grinding slowly became a fundamental aspect of single-players RPGs even though its repetitive nature has been said to be a result of poor game design". Even if the concept is as old as RPGs themselves, hasn't always been a defining characteristic.
So, yes, there is controversy as to if grinding is enjoyable or not, but saying that "RPGs have been grind heavy since the first RPG" is plain wrong. When you play an RPG, you play a role. It should be the player's choice what amount of grinding the role implies, much like people chose different difficulties.