安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
The 1.5(e)/10 formula is a good rule of thumb, and you'll pretty much be safe always using this price, but it's actually not the upper limit for how much you can get away with charging on newly built attractions. 1.5(e)/10 is simply the highest you can go without having guests complain a ton about your pricing, which would hurt your price rating (and your overall happiness). However, not all guests are created equal. The more a ride matches the rider's intensity preference, the more they are willing to pay. I am not 100% on this, but I believe the happier guests are, the more they are willing to spend also. This is true in the RCTs parkitect is based on, so I imagine it applies here as well. If your park is wildly successful and guest happiness is already high, you can get away with charging more for rides, as a general rule. Not a large amount, mind you, we're talking a couple dimes worth of difference, but these things add up.