安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









ZOS is the developer for ESO, not Bethesda Game Studios.
ESO is Published by Bethesda Softworks NOT Bethesda Game Studios, they're not responsible for its development.
Even then, Bethesda Softworks is owned by ZeniMax Media.
So your advice shouldn't be towards Bethesda, it should be at ZeniMax Media, and even that doesn't make sense. As the resources poured into ESO have no impact on the development of TESVI or Starfield. If you wan't to criticize Fallout 76 or Elder Scrolls: Blades be my guest as those do pull resources away from TESVI and Starfield as they're Bethesda game studios properties.
But how about we let Bethesda Game Studios and development get a proper engine for their title first instead of running with the shitty Gamebryo engine eh?