安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









Broadening your range of available options for a single ability point is both min/maxing and pro-fun (but can also be considered anti-min/maxing if you could instead max out another strong option instead of using points where not needed just for the fun of it).
To me this guide nicely complements other guides that focus on efficiency over fun. Of course fun is subjective to a degree so many tips here might seem strange, but you don't need to follow only this guide (or to follow it at all).
Personally I found it very helpful since it discarded anxiety about having frustrating problems in my casual co-op first playthrough and that I don't really need to worry about builds until I go for honor mode later on.
the 1st sentce of the 1st point of the 1st chapter of this guide is litterally a tip based on minmaxing.
That shows some serious level of consistent inconsistency between the writing and the thinking of the author.
And who is the author anyway explaining to me how to have fun the right way.
I clearly know how to have tons of fun myself (as this post proves).
Bad guide.