安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









i just thought it was interesting, and have potential uses, to have one station with a variety of platform arrangements. Using modular stations in this way might also make it easier to extend the catchment area of the station.
But, at the end of the day, the game gives us many options and different ways to design our worlds in whatever way we prefer. Whatever floats your boat. :)
okay... but I just don't get it. Why configurating a Station and not simply use a second one?
Just place on 80m Passener Station and then the second one conecting to the first. From the pure Vision aspect you do have one 160m Station but technically two seperate stations.
Do I miss something, does this not work?
It's a simple way, perhaps, of having two trains of the same type coming into the station on the same track at the same time, most likely from opposite directions. Cargo and Passenger platforms are counted as belonging to separate stations so don't need a gap to differentiate them.