安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题











- I wish KSP2 would provide those with less impact on PC performance XD
I think one important reason hindering such crafts from being popular is their complexity. They are a hell to design and also a hell to operate, both for me and for my PC (yeah I mean the part count). On the other hand, going far beyond Kerbin system or lifting massive payload might be rather rare activities. Therefore, such crafts might not be easy to enjoy, both for designers and users. They will receive high respect from those who understand them, but front page seems to welcome rather simple stuff to have fun with.
However I believe that we shouldn't build crafts with the goal in mind that it has to hit front page...And a nice SSTA remains my ultimate goal.