安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









But in your instances all of these merchants had to clim up the political ladder to get away with what thay did.
Historically it's rare that any one single merchant had sway over nations to be able to declare war, but claiming that no business historically has attempted to kill another business leader is a bit silly. Patricians in the Hanseatic League were at each other's throats constantly, funding privateers to rob rival merchants, and they competed with merchants from Mediterrean too.
I don't know, just saying that no merchant in the history of ever never did anything underhanded to another is a lie.
If an opposing merchant convoy has a majority of it's interests invested into that certain trade, hiring assassins, or thugs to take those goods is perfectly logical. Obviously you can't do this ingame but leading a group of troops and destroying them? Totally fine.
Slave traders, the people that raided, beat people up and sold them off, were also merchants.