安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









There's at least one impossible bonus goal in the campaign (destroy Tow AAA in 5.3; just replayed, and it's too far away for you to even hit with missiles before it's gone, even with everything to engines) and plenty that are impossible without cheating (go ahead and try to tell me you survived 24 X-wings, 12 at a time, in your single TIE fighter in the first simulator mission - I could use a laugh). There's simply no way they expect 100% perfection.
I believe the point of bonus missions was the developers covering their bases on what the players might do, no matter how insane they thought it was. If a player is careful and patient enough, maybe they could destroy a M/FRG with just a Tie Bomber. Why not give them an atta boy and some points for it if they do?
So unlike Primary or Secondary objectives, it's best to treat Bonus objectives as just that: a bonus. You should go for them if you can, but don't drive yourself nuts trying.
Mission 2.5 - impossible bonus goals? In a T/F and 3 capital ships to destroy. The T/B’s get toasted way early and there’s a mission design bug. Commander says they’re carrying “heavy rockets and will do a lot of damage” - hardly the case 😂 They have torpedoes instead 🤦🏻♂️