安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









I was aware of this but I forgot to add it.
You have two workers, A and B, on neighboring tiles. A is checking the contents of B's tile, and B is also checking something. A will block at the if until B's own if command is complete. The timing of unblocking A depends on what B does next.
If B does a step, pickUp, or jump, then A unblocks immediately, and A and B will act simultaneously.
However, if B's next operation is drop, then A will continue blocking until B finishes dropping.
To see this in action, load up puzzle #20 and run this program:
pickup s
if w == nothing or
w != nothing:
step n
endif
if w == nothing or
w != nothing:
drop
endif
Everybody picks up their cube at once. Then, everbody steps north at once. Then, they drop their cubes in order from left to right. The last person waits for seven other people to finish dropping in sequence, instead of dropping immediately.
IF
e = worker AND
s = datacube OR
w = worker
step se
else
step s.
How come someone who has nothing to the e (not complying with the first "if" condition) does step se?
I dont get it...