安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








But since you mentioned it, it's worth noting that this is what a well exposed HDR image looks like, as opposed to the so-called "HDR graphics" of some modern games (like Project Cars) which show white over-exposed skies and very dark foregrounds. That's not "high dynamic range", it's actually HIGH CONTRAST, which is the total opposite of HDR! It simulates the low dynamic range of normal photographs, with the attendent problems of over and under-exposure! If this photo wasn't an HDR image, the rocks in the foreground would be completely black.
I did a monochrome version as well which looked more natural without the excessive blue, but then it lost impact and didn't really look like a night photo anymore. I've obviously reduced the resolution. I haven't looked at the original for a long time. This was taken 10 years ago, early in January 2007.