Страсть к Курению 最近的评测

fun game for fun times kill the golems and the frogs and the other guys

this game is really good the main character feels like a chekist stationed in yekaterinburg and the enemies you annhilate and kill almost certainly deserved it. also you can collect cheevos

this game would be a great game if eu4 didnt exist.

johan took four games and threw them together like a some weird concoction, that's not bad in itself but it quite literally a situation where in about 3 to 4 years they will mesh well together

you can snowball harder in eu5 than you can in eu4 (lol!)

ai has no idea what it is doing, suicides into you, can not keep up with the everchanging economy and your nation being an outlier and even if paradox say in two weeks "the ai won't walk into your armies now" it'll be another year before they can get used to them, and the new systems they add them the ai will struggle with!!

---------good things-----------

colonisation compared to eu4 is great infinitely better, but also since conquest of paradise was one of EU4's first dlcs and colonisation got piecemeal updates over a decade it is no surprise to see how great colonisation is now, the new pop system compliments it very well.

estates are fun and fluid, more annoying than in eu4, but definitely more substance and ways to manage them, im fine with annoying estates, it adds more to the game at the moment since estates will annoy you more than any neighbouring country.



-----boring part-----
i will never play this game as much as i ever played eu4, will never be that age again so it's not going to happen, however i will say the foundation for this game is much better than base hoi4, eu4, and ck3. at launch. all of those games were entirely playable except eu4 and eu5 is firmly fine at the current stage.

in the next few months to a year i imagine this will have an ai that will try to emulate an actual threat, but if you were on the fence about this game and you didnt like how you could snowball in eu4, then you won't like this game. if you never played eu4 or didnt like eu4 at all, you will probably like this game.

i think it's fine, i will play it when im off work and im sure i will learn to enjoy it as i learnt to enjoy eu4.






also for anybody out there who hoped that this game was not going to be a snowball competition i am lolling at u eternally

top tier game

after every day of work i load this up and become what i was always meant to be; a chekist

brezhnev's new years speech

not a fun game, also glory to the people's republic of china total western death

i should preface by saying, i dont think the gameplay is bad, i actually think its quite good.

civ 7's biggest downside is that it's ui and general information sharing (quite important in strat games who would have thought) is awful. like downright not even a thought put into it. this is my biggest and only real gripe.

however as someone who hated civ 6 and only really enjoyed civ 5, i do think this game is quite fun, multiplayer is more stable but the way you age up in multiplayer feels odd compared to singleplayer.


i enjoy it, i will keep playing it but i dont suggest it in it's current state at all.



note: if you do get it, get a good ui mod, it makes the game much more bearable.

mix of a puzzle game and a strategy game. can be challenging at times until you get to know the maps and the respective positions that each civ starts in. definitely fun solo or with 2-4 friends if you want to mess about in mp.

patch 1.03 edit

the balance of guns and combat is slightly better, the stuttering as improved somewhat but still occurs.

AI-Life still isnt implemented and wont be until a later unknown patch.

most script issues have been fixed and so i'm filling to change my opinion on the game i think its still in the range of not great right now, but definitely will be top quality in the future.