15
已评测
产品
161
帐户内
产品

S.O.B. class 1 最近的评测

< 1  2 >
正在显示第 1 - 10 项,共 15 项条目
尚未有人觉得这篇评测有价值
总时数 91.9 小时 (评测时 83.0 小时)
This one's a mixed bag. DICE seemed to have listened to some of the biggest pain points in 2042, yet this still isn't a proper Battlefield experience. The biggest thing holding it back is the maps, they're awful. Overall size has been cut down when compared to past titles, tactical lanes are few and predictable, recons tilt balance too far due to poor map high ground and choke point design.
If you're looking for the BF3/BF4/BF1 feel, you won't find it in this game. It's safe to say that style is dead. For example, Operation Firestorm in BF6 has 50% less playable area than it did in BF3 and BF4, yet DICE tried to sell it as the same map. You can feel the size difference though if you played the previous titles during prime time, the narrowed map forces 3 primary lanes for advancement or defense, forcing unnatural kill boxes.

Looking at it without the lens of older BF titles? It's not a bad game, it gets a lot right that CoD could never figure out with mid-size maps. The slightly blended feel of the two competing titles actually works out really well. The biggest issue is those that view their stat card as the object by which they will measure their success in life, they can't comprehend how to play as a team, only how to farm as many kills as possible. As this is still Battlefield, that play style often ends up costing the team the entire match. All of that in mind, I do still recommend the game. It's different, the play style is different and new for the franchise, and just because something is new does not make it inherently bad.
发布于 2025 年 12 月 20 日。
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐 奖励
有 3 人觉得这篇评测有价值
有 1 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
总时数 22.0 小时 (评测时 12.0 小时)
An absolutely wonderful game completely ruined by "always online" mechanics. I can't recommend any always online game these days, if the game doesn't reach the shareholders ignorant goals then they put it on the back burner until it's time to free the server up for something new. Dirt 2.0 is extremely slow, with frequent network drop outs and failed actions.
发布于 2025 年 8 月 16 日。
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐 奖励
有 2 人觉得这篇评测有价值
总时数 0.0 小时
Under the previous ownership this ship was FREE. Now it's a grotesque $40,00. DO NOT BUY ANYTHING FROM STILLFRONT GROUP
发布于 2025 年 4 月 19 日。
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐 奖励
有 5 人觉得这篇评测有价值
总时数 32.6 小时 (评测时 32.4 小时)
It seems that the game was purchased by your typical low IQ shareholder group that then wiped everyone's progress and added complexity for the sake of adding complexity to force increased interaction with the game. Stillfront AB is well known in the gaming industry as a "Game killer" who even admits them selves that they are "specialized in the acquisition and management of mobile and browser game studios." Which basically means that they're uninspired non-gamers that make their money by purchasing low performing titles, make god awful changes that kill the game, then add in-game purchases for outrageous amounts of money hoping to milk the cow for all she's worth before tossing her in the meat grinder for parts. The company is currently publicly traded for 42 cents USD and has 494 million outstanding shares, painting a pretty clear picture that no one else thinks they're worth anything either.
发布于 2025 年 4 月 19 日。
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐 奖励
有 4 人觉得这篇评测有价值
总时数 22.4 小时 (评测时 2.5 小时)
For a game over 60gb and coming from the legendary Obsidian Entertainment, I honestly had much higher hopes for this title.
The game feels very hollow, the combat is uninspired, it's trying much to hard to be the two titles it want's to share space with but it doesn't even come close to comparing. At best, I think I could describe this as a reskin of WoT. It's a free game, it doesn't force spending of real money to move up, you can easily unlock every single vehicle with nothing but PvE if that's your bag. Personally, I don't recommend it simply because it won't hold attention for very long.
发布于 2025 年 4 月 16 日。
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐 奖励
有 24 人觉得这篇评测有价值
有 5 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
2
总时数 0.0 小时
This pack is the most unrealistic thing to have ever come into the Hunter universe.

I'll sum this up quickly.

In-Game: 300 Blackout out-performs the 7.62x54R.
Real world: 7.62x54R has almost triple the muzzle energy of 300 Blackout. 54R typically carries the same energy at 400 yards that 300 blackout delivers at 200 yards.

In-Game: .450 Bushmaster is almost identical to the .270.
Real World: .450 Bushmaster is designed for AR platform rifles and for use in brush hunting, NOT long-range shooting. The .270 Win outperforms the 450 Bushmaster past 100 yards in every category.

More "I've never actually shot a gun or studied a ballistics table" content from Expansive Worlds. At this point the game is a lost cause.

发布于 2025 年 3 月 2 日。
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐 奖励
有 6 人觉得这篇评测有价值
有 1 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
总时数 0.3 小时
抢先体验版本评测
Absolutely nothing like the advertisements we all saw on TikTok. The game is a first person PvP shooter with a heavy focus on first person view realism. If that's what you're looking for, then you've found your gem. The gameplay videos and adverts that I watched showed a FPVR military/police sim and this IS NOT that game. If you like it, it's probably an awesome title, however I feel extremely misled about what this game is, even the description on Steam makes it sound like what I thought it was, there is ZERO mention of the game being strictly PvP.

WHO THIS IS FOR: If you love Counter Strike and you ever thought to yourself, "Man I really wish this game had extremely realistic and amazing graphics." then congratulations! You've found what you've always dreamed of. That's what this game is and for what it's worth, it does a PHENOMENAL job at being that game.
发布于 2025 年 2 月 20 日。 最后编辑于 2025 年 2 月 20 日。
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐 奖励
1 人觉得这篇评测有价值
总时数 30.9 小时 (评测时 30.8 小时)
*I have MUCH more than 30 hours in game, my games all reset several years ago after my account was stolen and I regained access.*

This game still holds up as one of the best ever made in the RTS genre, feeling more like a blend between an RTS, a MOBA, and a dungeon crawler. 40K:DoW2 feels much different the other two titles in the DoW series. If you're thinking about picking it up, stop thinking, just do it. I played when it was released and I now find myself, a father of 2 in my thirties picking it back up because newer games just don't scratch the gameplay quality itch that I have.
发布于 2024 年 9 月 24 日。
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐 奖励
尚未有人觉得这篇评测有价值
总时数 9.8 小时 (评测时 8.5 小时)
I have SIGNIFICANTLY more hours in RF9, I moved it to Steam only recently. I can't recommend any Horizon Hobby product due to their business practices with the release of Evolution and their "discount" for RF9 buyers. Evolution doesn't provide ANYTHING over 9.5 that makes it worth another $70. Find a different RC Sim if you'd like a *CLEAR VIEW* on practicing flying without risking your aircraft. (search the starred capitalized words.)
发布于 2023 年 10 月 1 日。
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐 奖励
1 人觉得这篇评测有价值
总时数 367.2 小时 (评测时 19.4 小时)
I was VERY on-the-fence with purchasing this game initially. I think my wife and I did around 10 hours each of research to see if it worth spending the $150 on between the two of us for base game plus DLC content we wanted. YouTube video's, game magazine articles, blogs, ect. After all of that we still hadn't found much concrete evidence that was enough to sway us one way or the other.
The issue was we both were active on Classic and we both *enjoyed* classic a lot. Much of the information on CotW seemed negative in comparison to the realism aspect between the two games. As two IRL hunters, let me assure you that realism is not an issue CotW has. Yes, it still is a video game and is "dumbed down" compared to the real thing, no one wants to spend a week in the forest to grab 1 buck on a video game then do it again come big game season. You can bag a considerable amount of game in a short period of time in game.
Now for the bad, there's A LOT.
Equipment play is barren. There's not enough tools in the base game and I haven't found any extra's in DLC's outside of the High Tech Hunter for example. No monocular's, no bait stations, no electric callers, all in Classic and missing in CotW.
Gun play is pretty barren too. Classic is EXTREMELY specific as to what rounds you may use to bag what game. Use .243 Nosler on a hog and you'll not only get yelled at but you won't get paid. CotW doesn't seem to penalize you much at all for shooting a class 1 species with a class 9 rifle. (Think using 45-70 Gov to take down a Turkey. IRL you'd get a massive fine and very little bird left to pick up. CotW doesn't really care.)
Firearm realism is missing in this game and it bugs me more than it should. For example, IRL I hunt Coyote with a 22LR. In game, 22LR even from a a rifle is only good for class 1 while a coyote is class 2. Like I said above though, that doesn't matter from a gameplay perspective. What does matter is the listed effective ranges for weapons. DO NOT buy a DLC because you like using the firearm IRL. Great example, lets say you use an M&P-10 chambered in .308 during hunting season so you want to buy the Modern Firearms DLC, Your M&P-10 is generally good for 300-400 yards depending on the shooter, the game's version is only good for 164 yards. THAT is extremely frustrating, especially because I personally hunt with a 12 guage shotgun using rifled slugs. My hunting shotgun has a 28" barrel (insert Puntgun jokes here) and I'm effective out to 100-125 yards with it, GOOD LUCK getting those numbers in the game, it won't happen.

There's also a litany of bugs that aren't that game breaking so-far.
Hopefully my review gives some of the more hard-to-find information that we certainly never came across in our research.
发布于 2023 年 8 月 20 日。
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐 奖励
< 1  2 >
正在显示第 1 - 10 项,共 15 项条目