AgentSea 最近的评测

If you have the Gold Road edition, you need to pay for about 50,000 in crowns to own a license to all zones and dungeons. That's about $350. Really?

This game could use a lot of changes to the mechanics -- it might have only been two hours, but, as it stands, it's TOO difficult to start out.

Sure, realistically you're going to have an extremely low chance of success, but that kind of frustration will be the downfall of the game in its current state. Also, it's extremely poorly optimized - despite the appearance, it maxes out a 7900 XT... Really? The combat is very clunky and not fluid in the least. Sure, it is nice to emulate actual combat speed, but, for the sake of gameplay it makes little sense.

Also, regarding the tech tree -- the player is just thrown under the bus immediately upon starting. Many of the materials and prerequisites *require* intense effort. It's supposed to be a survival game, not a Soulslike.

RT always on makes this game a lag fiesta. Snapping of roads could use some work. The game lagged and crashed on me, on a machine with a 4080 Mobile and an i9 13900HX with 96GB of DDR5. No day-one workshop support? Really? Also, RT needs to be disabled by default -- it does little for display fidelity. Also, FSR need not apply here - you need the detail, you can't skimp on the view, otherwise go back to SC4.

Pros:
+ Roads aren't bad out of the box
+ It looks better

Cons:
- RT always ON makes this game impossible to play without turning down settings.
- NO workshop support out of the box.
- Crash on day 1? Really?
EDIT, for new cons:
- Paid mods lol what
- Still runs like utter garbage.

TL;DR Wait about 6 months to a year for Paradox to iron out the issues.

Update in 2025: It's STILL a bit broken, it could use more optimization. The graphics actually look very bad, it's not crisp.

Update in 2026: It's STILL somewhat broken.

On my desktop, I have 128gb RAM, a 13900k, and a 7900 XT. This game loads the CPU fully at 60k population now. Get real.

I have played WoT on and off since 2011. The devs have a flimsy excuse that you cannot link your Steam and WoT accounts, DESPITE THE CAPABILITY TO UNLINK YOUR ACCOUNTS AVAILABLE IN WG ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT. Really taking the pish here, huh?

DLC: too many
Exploits: lots
Ottomans: do NOT like Byzantium
Salish: can become Cascadia easily
5/5 I can form Russia but I'm too scared to play Ming, because it has exploded into a dozen states by the time I find them.
Too dang addicting, so many mods, I almost regret learning how to play grand strategy... goodness, can't put it down!

please stop breaking this ancient game because of muh copyright, you should be ashamed of yourselves

This game requires an obscene amount of DLC to keep it from having the AI break itself basically -- 1.8.X: Axis would literally beat the Allies every time, even if you play as the Allies. They fixed this, but seriously?

It is ridiculously frustrating at first with a steep learning curve, but gets extremely addicting after you figure out how to play it right.

Protip: If you are buying this game, make sure you have your wallet prepared for all the DLC you will need to make it a decent game to play. The base game is barebones unless if you only like playing as the major nations.

You can't even annex your puppets properly without DLC. Sigh. Literally, the DLC is a bunch of mechanics that should have been in the base game. Paradox does this with basically everything.

If they release a game, just wait a couple years basically and THEN you will be able to buy it at a reasonable price and get good functionality out of it. $20 for DLC?! Seriously? Most of the content isn't worth the contents of my toilet bowl after gas station sushi. To quote an anonymous person, "any game dev born after 1993 only knows three things, microtransactions, post-processing and DLC." I may seem like an old man yelling at the clouds, but yes, we really did have it all. Now, we are living in the shadow of the golden era, akin to 1984 or East Germany after WWII/the Weimar days.

Warning: this is an early access game. I know. This review may seem to have some vitriol, but it is not. I just want to see these guys make a super good game, they already have the building blocks for it.
Things that are good:
- Gameplay seems straightforward enough, plenty of mechanics to play with.
- Research tree is pretty cool
- Multiplayer
- Small developer
- No apparent gamebreaking glitches while playing

Things that require improvement
- PLEEEAAAASE, I hope you release the editor soon! And when you do, I hope it includes a way to modify trains/add different train types, similar to Cities Skylines since I am guessing this game uses Unity. Ditto for scenarios and different resource types.
- Graphics cannot be adjusted at all.
- Game is graphically intensive for no clear reason (visuals are meh at best)
- MP with more than two players
- Judging by camera angles, there's potential for even bigger maps.
- No Linux or macOS builds yet.
- THERE IS ZERO SUPPORT FOR CHANGING LEVELS OF RAILS, or building underpasses/flyovers, and the station mechanic is silly.
- No multiple stations per city? In multiple instances historically, a railroad may have multiple stations in the same city...
- I am hoping third rail/pantograph trains become a thing in this game, e.g. for European settings.

At this stage due to all of the missing features, I can't recommend this game at the moment. I got it on sale so I can't whinge much about it.

FO4 Creation Club? How many times do we have to tell you... no. Please, no paid mods, whether it be paid with fake currency or real currency.

Pros:
+not as blocky as previous games, most of it is due to lighting
+player character
+factions that are pretty neat
+game does a good job of eating time, it's engaging
+again, the lighting helps a lot

Cons:
-Power armor in the first hour? ????
-Radscorpions IN MASSACHUSETTS?
-Where the heck is karma and why is it limited to companions?
-The stock weapon choices are abysmal at best, and previous 3D games did not have so many improvised weapons.
-All of a sudden, power armor requires fusion cores, another odd change from the previous 3D games
-Performance is bad for how this game has so many relatively low-res objects
-STOP. TRYING. TO. MAKE. US. PAY. FOR. MODS. Seriously, can't you just use your infinite creativity to do something other than rehash old releases? Release a new game that isn't a friggin' money grab. Shame. On. You.
-Most of Boston is intact yet everything is coated in rubble, and a nuke didn't even hit it directly...
-Why did Boston not get hit by any nukes directly? The reasoning should be explored, since New Vegas actually explained why it was that way.
-How come in the base game, you can't make anything that looks new, and nothing looks new or untattered other than cartons of cigarettes, 210 year old beer, and cans of food? Did people forget how to manufacture and make concrete walls/walls that aren't made of rubble until you added it into the game?

Until you guys post a definitive statement about modding that actually tells me that you won't try to half*** take it away again, I will not give you a positive review nor buy any more of your games. TakeTwo/R*, stop hiding behind legalese and be straightforward. If big companies like Microsoft and Google can do it and be cut and dry, so can you. Until then, I refuse to buy any more games published by TakeTwo.

The dumb moneygrab instituted by them in the form of asinine shark cards, along with a HORRIBLE built-in P2P multiplayer drives me away. SA-MP at least has communities that are very good and supportive, along with good RP MP. You guys had 10 years to get what SA-MP and MTA:SA did in less time as far as MP goes.

DO NOT buy this game, don't subsidize their moneygrubbing. At least EA is honest when they rip you off.