安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题

Kosamini
You need to voice your opinion to Valve instead about the current state of curators if you want it to change:
https://psteamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/discussions/forum/10/
I wish it was that simple, but good, constructive curators don't get the attention and point across. And it doesn't help how good anything is if you don't wanna see it at all.
Also, this being the same as the bad curators is your opinion, it may look like it on the surface but the intent and message is completely different - and a lot of people find it to be the next best thing to being able to turn off curators completely. I don't even see those other curators as abusers, the source of the problem is on Valve's side.
As long as you're able to see No Curation among other curators on Steam, even after ignoring it, it'll stay. The day curators can be turned off or hidden completely, I'll be happy to delete it all.
You can help, too: https://psteamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/discussions/forum/10/
To quote my own curator: ''Copy-paste reviews target an audience who prefer ♥♥♥♥♥♥ memes, easy likes or other purposes that might contradict their own existence. These kind of curators will ultimately kill the reason why Steam Curators exist because players will get tired of them. That's why we are never do the PR stunts they do, even if that may cause less growth in a following.''
Do you have an example of any groups that have more than 500?