STEAM 组
Idle Master idlemaster
STEAM 组
Idle Master idlemaster
1,268
游戏中
8,180
在线
成立于
2014 年 8 月 19 日
语言
英语
所有讨论 > 综合讨论 > 主题详情
drag 2017 年 8 月 14 日 上午 5:25
Doesn't idle all games at a time.
It's only idling 1 game at a time.
< >
正在显示第 1 - 6 条,共 6 条留言
Shadok 2017 年 8 月 14 日 上午 6:16 
And?
drag 2017 年 8 月 14 日 上午 6:19 
It should be idling all games at the same time when I choose the option, no?
Shadok 2017 年 8 月 14 日 上午 7:10 
Nope. The "Idle all" option is an artifact from when no game would drop cards before 2 hours would pass. The more efficient way to do it has always been to idle 1 by 1, hence it working the way it does.

Since the program is now no-longer in development, it's unlikely the option will ever be added either.

That said the program is not malfunctioning, it simply never has been able to idle everything at once beyond 2 hours.
drag 2017 年 8 月 14 日 上午 7:38 
Oooh okay. Thanks a lot.
Borgen 2017 年 8 月 16 日 下午 8:31 
引用自 Shadok
Nope. The "Idle all" option is an artifact from when no game would drop cards before 2 hours would pass. The more efficient way to do it has always been to idle 1 by 1, hence it working the way it does.

Since the program is now no-longer in development, it's unlikely the option will ever be added either.

That said the program is not malfunctioning, it simply never has been able to idle everything at once beyond 2 hours.

Just to be clear - are you saying the "Idle each game individually" option is always the most efficent idling behaviour?
Shadok 2017 年 8 月 17 日 上午 2:03 
引用自 Borgen
引用自 Shadok
Nope. The "Idle all" option is an artifact from when no game would drop cards before 2 hours would pass. The more efficient way to do it has always been to idle 1 by 1, hence it working the way it does.

Since the program is now no-longer in development, it's unlikely the option will ever be added either.

That said the program is not malfunctioning, it simply never has been able to idle everything at once beyond 2 hours.

Just to be clear - are you saying the "Idle each game individually" option is always the most efficent idling behaviour?
I cannot safely say "ALWAYS" but in 90% of tests it is.
< >
正在显示第 1 - 6 条,共 6 条留言
每页显示数: 1530 50

所有讨论 > 综合讨论 > 主题详情
发帖日期: 2017 年 8 月 14 日 上午 5:25
回复数: 6