安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题

N K K K K YS/K
N B B B BM N
YA
G
YA
N N K N K K N/YS
B B B BM
YA
G
YA
all my units are upgraded vets that are very expensive. Since we cannot determine what the next guy has how could I improve on this?
As for the merger.. is it a merge or absorbtion.. i.e are you losing station as clan leader and we all take orders from another?
1. We should merge with clans that are active and play fairly regularly.
2. Will we have a new logo, new clan name , specialization etc?
In terms of the clan competion, I think we should have 5-7 provinces as our base and expand out afterwards. We should also employ a system of attack-build policy. Some clan members attack provinces, others build on top of the newly captured ones. I think the Koreans were efficent at this process. If you noticed, each of their captured provinces had huge scores. Maybe Inania can assign attacking/building turns during the week.
All that work we put in and all gone...pfft. What a bunch of noobs we are plauying against. But, we will get em next time. Anyway as my drunk friend use to say "Failure is the cornerstone of success"