安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



Another thing is that most gamers today buy lots of cheap games – sometimes just because they’re on sale – but many of those games end up never really being played. That’s fine, because they were cheap and easy to grab.
But then there are the games we really love, the ones we put hundreds of hours into. For those, many of us would actually be willing to pay more if it meant true ownership – having the files forever, being able to back them up, and play them offline no matter what happens to the platform.
So in my opinion, it makes sense to keep both options: cheap licenses for people who just want to try or collect games, and a more expensive ownership option for players who want to invest in the games they truly care about.