安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题


http://img810.imageshack.us/i/logo20.png/
Send me a message and let me know what you think.
Lots of engies is pointless. they're sacrificing movement and HP for immobile objects. Additionally, metal is limited and can't support 3 engies.
If they want to go engies, you have a spy and a demo and two soldiers, plus a heavy to tank the damage sufficiently.
pe ahs temp logo imma do my own rendition of it
Hmmm....
If I chose a class (like a spy), it would prevent others from selecting that class to become better at it. This will hinder growth in player's abiliities and cause our members to seek out less restricted servers or groups for development.
Got a 2nd reason why 1 class per team is a bad idea.
We already have 50 + members. Having 1 class per team would mean only 9 max per team (18 people max per game). What if we have a full house and have 15 vs 15? It would be unfair for people to sit out on a game and this will ulitmately hinder the development of this group.