安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题

Ill still play the open world now and then, and when server things goes better try the FOB stuff.
As they have stated in multiple demos that you could both defend and visit your friend's FOBs, I can only imagine this will be possible with a later patch. If not, the group will still remain active, as we have MGO to look forward to.
It's that tension which makes the FOB system so interesting to me.
But I do think the way it works, as-is, is good enough. If you invade someone you should already be aware of how much of a risk it is.
I'm not going to boot people out if they decide to try it, though, since we don't know how targets are selected. You might get dropped in against someone in the group against your will, for instance. It doesn't seem very enforceable from my end, anyway. I'll let the natrual cycle of revenge be the moderator, unless everyone gets up in arms against one person who's only reason for joining was to get more target of oppertunity. If that happens, I'll make a post and we can decide what to do.