安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



would be a nice way to make an extra bit of clams on the side, but in comparison to the amount from game sales it is rather small.
Can anyone imagine the headlines? It would be a death sentence to any publisher caught doing that.
You may have you tinfoil hat too tight on ;)
So, your logic says that Steam would drive away players and those who buy on the Steam platform :-)? Understand that there is no game without cheaters. Quite the opposite. Cheaters are the ones who do harm to the Steam platform.
I would too, son. It doesn't work that way. They're breaking into the Pentagon. This war has been going on for a long time and it's getting worse. Hybrid war.
First, let's look at expenses that Valve has.
- VAC. There are expenses of course. Development, upkeep, labour cost, further development, and, without a doubt, legal advice. We don't know how much money this is, but I'd say it is safe to assume that it is mega money. This is a VERY expensive undertaking. And the costs don't stop, this is something that just keeps drawing money.
- The financial damage that cheating produces. Cheating can outright kill a game and carry the damage to other games aswell, like sequels. That is in essence the reason why these companies spend all that money on anti cheat systems in the first place. They spend big to prevent even bigger financial damage.
Now, in order to make money from "being in on the sale of cheats", the profit would have to significantly outweigh those expenses.
Now, as I said, we don't have the numbers, so, could this outweigh the expenses? Possibly, I don't know. I'd be VERY surprised if that was the case, but still, possible.
But it would have to be a lot more. A LOT more. Why?
Because of the gigantic risk: The truth coming out. It would have to be so much more money that it would offset everything breaking down. Imagine that coming out. That could kill a company. Kill it deader than the deadest thing that ever deaded. And this would come out. I mean, look at the kinds of leaks we see coming from various companies all the time. Most of that is stuff that makes you go "not good, bad. Anyway, what's for dinner".
And still, there were people in the loop that went "the world needs to know".
I would asign a probability of 100 to there being someone in the loop on Valve being involved in selling cheats who would go "the players need to know".
And even if there wasn't, Valve couldn't ever be sure. So What would Valve have to do to keep this from coming out?
There would have to be some sort of mob style black mail scheme to keep everybody in line. And what if someone shows signs of maybe squeeling about it anyway? Concrete shoes and sleeping with the fishes?
Why all that risk if you can just comfortably make ungodly amounts of money from the market alone?
Congrats for digging up a post that's been in the grave for 13 years by now
this is from 2012, what made you think that was worth it?