安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



The temperature cycles with the sun. Humans just make pollution not climate change.
It's like claiming that every sommer is rainy because you are experiencing one out of 10 summers where there was no drought. Doesn't mean that there weren't 9 droughts before and after your rainy summer.
You are selectively ignoring everything else besides the things you want to see.
There is overhwelming scientific consense, that climate change is man-made. With hundreds if not thousands of peer-reviewed studies proving that.
Also it completely tracks with my personal experience over the past 20-30 years, where winters in my area became noticably warmer with a noticable lack of snowfall as well as heat streaks during summer that I never experienced before.
Were we? Who was claiming that?
I don't follow conspiracy theorist websites, so no I don't know about things they made up.
Cracks me up that in the 90's they discovered the Atlantic Multi-Decadal Oscillation, something that by its very nature would invalidate all previous climate models, but just kept pretending that the models were all still perfectly accurate.