Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem



edit: but anyway, extrajudicial killings of people have never been a good look for any of the US governments of the last... Too many years. That's pretty much it. So obviously, thanks Obama. Peace out xoxo
Party I don't like is in power: "Time to question everything."
They absolutely do not make sure, that non-lethal measures to apprehend the suspects are being taken. How do I know that? Because after the military has been critcised for potentially commiting a crime suddenly they somehow started taking prisoners. So that obviously never was not an option.
Strange, isn't it?
Even if they all were drug smugglers, you can't just kill criminals. You apprehend them and then you prosecute them.
Obama ordering extrajudicial killings was also wrong. So stop using that strawman ever again.
That said, if, in the process of apprehending those criminals, they start shooting, it is perfectly acceptable to shoot back. Also, if you hail them, tell them to heave to, and they do not, disabling their vessel is within the realm of reasonable. Blowing it into tiny pieces might be a bit overboard..... but, if you aren't doing anything wrong, then you shouldn't need to be running.
The issue is: Did they? According to all we know, there was no step step taken before drone striking them. And the fact, that the Navy managed to take prisoners after being accused of war crimes disproves the vapid excuse, that every single boat fires at a US military ship. (And I will ignore the ridiculous claim, that a US warship was in any way threatened or in danger by small arms fire)
This isn't true. Congress automatically authorises the president to go to war for 60 days at any point, and they can then continually re-authorise another 60 days in perpetuity. They do not call it war however, it's got some other label
speaking of obama...