安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



edit: but anyway, extrajudicial killings of people have never been a good look for any of the US governments of the last... Too many years. That's pretty much it. So obviously, thanks Obama. Peace out xoxo
Party I don't like is in power: "Time to question everything."
They absolutely do not make sure, that non-lethal measures to apprehend the suspects are being taken. How do I know that? Because after the military has been critcised for potentially commiting a crime suddenly they somehow started taking prisoners. So that obviously never was not an option.
Strange, isn't it?
Even if they all were drug smugglers, you can't just kill criminals. You apprehend them and then you prosecute them.
Obama ordering extrajudicial killings was also wrong. So stop using that strawman ever again.
That said, if, in the process of apprehending those criminals, they start shooting, it is perfectly acceptable to shoot back. Also, if you hail them, tell them to heave to, and they do not, disabling their vessel is within the realm of reasonable. Blowing it into tiny pieces might be a bit overboard..... but, if you aren't doing anything wrong, then you shouldn't need to be running.
The issue is: Did they? According to all we know, there was no step step taken before drone striking them. And the fact, that the Navy managed to take prisoners after being accused of war crimes disproves the vapid excuse, that every single boat fires at a US military ship. (And I will ignore the ridiculous claim, that a US warship was in any way threatened or in danger by small arms fire)
This isn't true. Congress automatically authorises the president to go to war for 60 days at any point, and they can then continually re-authorise another 60 days in perpetuity. They do not call it war however, it's got some other label
speaking of obama...