安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
0 
举报此帖
What?
should I apply what I believe to be the function of a government or god, there may not be as many governmental body and god out there.
but they have lots of governments,the conclusion from this is, government is just a institution people make when lots of them share the same language and look, they have no function,
and try to imagine this, that I am a political leader, I want to pose control on the people over my side of border, do I seize their land by force, or do I trick their people into believing they have their own government to listen to?neither of these two approaches is without backfire.
the situation in Venezuela could be a similar one like Russia is now having with Ukraine, the attempt is to get the USA opinion out of way, out of sight depending on how well USA handles this potential conflict in Venezuela, and this is only from political respective alone, either to ride the wave or go under it, its clear the water isnt safe, they must have lots going, because I feel this isnt sentiment alone.
Edited to add: It's unfortunate that so many Latin American nations are ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ for the United States. Maybe it'd be healthy for the power imbalance on the planet if a bunch of Latin American nations got together to form some alliance against the USA.
I believe the OP's angle is entirely irrelevant to much of what I say though and their angle is just some contrarian Putin cheerleader angle.
Russia is part of the global problem also, to a lesser extent compared to the US but still part of the problem. Same with China, again to a far lesser extent.
His career has always been a masterclass in carnival barking. He makes a ton of noise, gets the crowd completely stirred up, and then blames someone else when his promises fail to materialize while assuring onlookers that "Trump is a winner; it's these losers over here that have failed Trump!"
Venezuela was meant to be a walkover because--on a 1:1 military basis--we'd dog walk them any day of the week with enough leash to spare for a neighbor or two.
But that's not what Trump wanted. He wanted Maduro to capitulate in order to prop up his (Trump's) strongman image.
If we do invade Venezuela, the conventional military conflict will be a "battle" in the loosest sense of the term. Taking and holding territory--particularly in the interior of the country--will be a different story, but dismantling Venezuela's conventional military structure will be swift and determinant.
But we're unlikely to do that. Trump wanted a show, didn't get it, and now like every other carpetbagger who came before him he needs to direct the crowd onto something new.
I don’t want to break your narrative too hard, but Venezuela isn’t made of cardboard.
The U.S. military has taken losses in countries with no real army, just sandals and AK-47s. Venezuela is a large country, heavily prepared, and its soldiers aren’t inferior to U.S. troops in any meaningful way.
A quick strike would require a massive U.S. force, and a long-term occupation would be completely unsustainable. Taking territory isn’t the same as holding it, especially in terrain worse than Vietnam. And unlike the Vietnam era, the political pressure today would explode the moment U.S. casualties rise.
Trump expected Maduro to fold under threats. He didn’t. That’s the real failure here.
All that money burned, all those weapons dumped into this conflict, and in the end Russia still advances.
How's that special military operation working out for Putin, my man? Nearly four years in, and you don't even control the Donbas.
Embarrassing.
It’s progressing. It’s a war of attrition, and in that kind of conflict the dynamic is slow by nature. I know that’s hard for an American mindset, which tends to expect everything to look like a decisive, fast, cinematic strike. But Russia’s objective hasn’t been territorial expansion for its own sake. The goal has been to neutralize the Ukrainian military and the huge quantity of Western equipment sent there.
Ukraine isn’t fighting alone; it’s a modern army trained, supplied, and supported by multiple NATO countries. The U.S. has never dealt with that kind of opponent directly. Even in conflicts against much weaker forces, the results were far from clean.. Vietnam is the obvious example, where superior equipment didn’t prevent defeat. And in Afghanistan, the withdrawal speaks for itself.
This is exactly why nothing will happen in Venezuela. An invasion would become unsustainable extremely quickly. Casualties, terrain, and political pressure would make it collapse long before any of the expected goals could be reached.
At the cost of the entire economy, a million men, loss of the black sea fleet, demoted to 2nd rate power and Still stuck in the donbas.
If this narrative helps you stay positive about the situation, then fair enough. Everyone copes in their own way.
Yes some people cope by spamming nonsense threads to deflect from reality.
This is what some people say just before Trump sticks his foot up someone's ass.
No everyone gets the pretend to be nice treatment.
Besides, he was being nice to Momdani for a few reasons. One is he will be mayor of New York City regardless of how ignorant it is. The people of New York will end up suffering for this. The ones that stay, that is.
The other is because eventually Momdani will learn the hard way that communism and socialism have been failed economic systems for centuries if not longer. Younger people need to learn the hard way on many occasions.
All that said, if Momdani comes begging for money I suspect he will be getting the fickle finger of fate from the Trump Administration. That will be the quickest ay to enlightenment for that twit.