安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
63 
举报此帖
You easily say Collateral but in that same year Christmas with the Kranks and Garfield came out which are diabolical.
Cherry picking never wins arguments.
As for the quality increase or decrease wouldn't be able to tell, my goal is to dodge as many fumbles as possible so if there are more fumbles today means at worse i'm re-watching classics or reading more, because for some reason whatever is going on with movies doesn't seem to come from the literary works.
A bit sad since it just proves there are worse writers in the movie making sector than in the literary world. Also since ~2017-19 seems to be more intentional, like a middle finger pointed to the spectator rather than a societal criticism meant to make people think on the matter.
Still waiting for Disney to apply their raceswapping formula to Tarzan, a black man in the jungle being raised by monkeys
They realized one-liners, immature comedy, and pop-culture references were more profitable than good narrative, cohesive & immersive presentation, and emotional sincerity.