the big bang has zero to do with atheism and being an atheist doesn't make someone qualified to explain the big bang.

ask a scientist.

What did they have to be created? Isn't it entirely possible that they have always been here?

引用自 HeyYou：

What did they have to be created? Isn't it entirely possible that they have always been here?

then they would have to have been there before time and time must be created

引用自 kilo 40：

the big bang has zero to do with atheism and being an atheist doesn't make someone qualified to explain the big bang.

ask a scientist.

Fair enough!

引用自 Fedora：

SO! As a christian i can't understand one thing, THE BIG BANG! Like how did nothingness make something, like two particles collided and creeated a giant explosion that created the universe , like what created the two things that exploded?

I suggest you read up on what the big bang theory actually says, because almost nothing you said is correct.

The big bang theory does not say, that "something came from nothing", it does not say, that "two particles colllided", it does not say, that there was a "giant explosion".

When you start out with such fundamentally flawed premisses, there is nothing to discuss here.

引用自 Fedora：

引用自 HeyYou：

What did they have to be created? Isn't it entirely possible that they have always been here?

then they would have to have been there before time and time must be created

Before time? When was that? Is it not possible they have always existed? What about god? Who created HIM?

引用自 Fedora：

引用自 HeyYou：

What did they have to be created? Isn't it entirely possible that they have always been here?

then they would have to have been there before time and time must be created

No. That does not follow from that premise.

There are plenty of theories out there.
Some more plausible then others.

Science is not opposed to religion but rather a supplement.

引用自 Сааребас：

There are plenty of theories out there.
Some more plausible then others.

Science is not opposed to religion but rather a supplement.

Science is for sure opposed to religion on many key points.

引用自 tallgeese：

引用自 Сааребас：

There are plenty of theories out there.
Some more plausible then others.

Science is not opposed to religion but rather a supplement.

Science is for sure opposed to religion on many key points.

Are you sure that science in fact oppose on key points rather then details?

In short version, the big bang theory suggests that the universe we observe today, at a distant point in time, started out much smaller with a much higher density and has since expanded into the size and density that it is now. It emerges from the equations of relativity and is viewed as the most likely explanation for a number of properties we've observed; the most important of which are the apparent expansion and the uniformity of its distribution.

As others have pointed out, it is unrelated entirely to one's religion or lack thereof. Many of the creators of it were theists, and some atheists dismiss it.

The concept you are describing, creatio ex nihilo ("creation from nothing") is not part of that theory and never was. It's a religious concept.

that was the previous iteration of the universe crunched into a small pile. it was bound to blow up eventually.

引用自 kilo 40：

the big bang has zero to do with atheism

I think not

引用自 Tröjan：

引用自 kilo 40：

the big bang has zero to do with atheism

I think not

facts disagree with you.

引用自 Grimble Grumble：

The concept you are describing, creatio ex nihilo ("creation from nothing") is not part of that theory and never was. It's a religious concept.

Also it is a strawman used by religious apologists to attack the big bang theory based on intuiton ("it is impossible that something came from nothing") by falsely claiming that the big bang theory says that. Which it doesn't.