At least she wouldn’t make US military members kneel on the floor and roll out the red carpet for putbutt’s body double in alaska.

So much for: pEaCe tHrOuGh StReNgTh!!!111

Trump: I want you stop the war
Putin: No
Trump: I'll send missiles to Ukraine
Putin: I'll release your tapes
Trump: Sorry master
Putin: Good boy

If she did would that mean she has bigger balls than trump

引用自 Homerchu：

Trump: I want you stop the war
Putin: No
Trump: I'll send missiles to Ukraine
Putin: I'll release your tapes
Trump: Sorry master
Putin: Good boy

Tapes?

引用自 St✩rlight：

If she did would that mean she has bigger balls than trump

Those aren't balls...

引用自 ChickenTacos：

引用自 St✩rlight：

If she did would that mean she has bigger balls than trump

Those aren't balls...

cojones

A little bit more pressure combined with some incentives like lifting sanctions and a commitment to put a hold on NATO enrollment would have brought peace and restore the prewar borders. That is if Reagan were president.

No, the US does not start world wars. They play innocent until they intervene. The devil in the background.

"Would Kamala Harris have started WWIII?"

no.

yes, its likely she would have.

Kamala Harris served as Vice President during several ongoing international conflicts and military engagements where U.S. troops were present in various capacities, as no "war" has been formally declared by the U.S. Congress since World War II.

Conflicts and engagements during her tenure (January 20, 2021 – January 20, 2025) include:

The War in Afghanistan: The U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan was completed in August 2021, ending the two-decade war.

Military Presence in Iraq and Syria: U.S. military personnel remained deployed in Iraq and Syria for missions to prevent a resurgence of ISIS and faced ongoing attacks by drone and rocket fire.

Russia's Invasion of Ukraine: Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. The U.S. has provided significant military and financial aid to Ukraine, with Harris involved in rallying international support and condemning Russia's actions.

Israel-Hamas War: Following the October 7, 2023 attack by Hamas, the U.S. supported Israel's right to self-defense while simultaneously calling for more humanitarian aid for Palestinians and working toward a two-state solution and a ceasefire.

Red Sea Engagements: The U.S. Navy faced the most intense running sea battles since the Second World War while operating in the Red Sea against Houthi rebels.

While U.S. forces were engaged in these situations, the Department of Defense stated that they were not fighting in active "declared war zones". Harris has been involved in nearly every National Security Council meeting and daily intelligence briefings, participating in the foreign policy decision-making process during these conflicts.

have a nice day

Kamala wouldn't launch nukes in defense of Ukraine. I find it highly likely should would have been far more supportive than Trump has been though.....

Harris wouldn't have been president, it would have been Obama running the show from behind the scenes just like it was with Obiden. Remember Obama said he'd install a puppet. You get a senile guy who has no idea where he is and then after that you get a non-functioning alcoholic. It's not rocket surgery.

As for whether Obama would have started WW3 in his 4th term, he already set up the groundwork for it in his second term and allowed it to escalate in his third. So, yeah.

Republicans: "we are violating the Geneva Conventions, murdering civilians on fishing boats, starting a war with Venezuela and attempting to side with Russian invaders led by an authoritarian against Ukraine. Now let's discuss a hypothetical situation where Harris would have started WW3 with nukes."

The only war she be fighting is the Battle of Jack Daniels...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxLH5aSmlBI

引用自 tallgeese：

Republicans: "we are violating the Geneva Conventions, murdering civilians on fishing boats, starting a war with Venezuela and attempting to side with Russian invaders led by an authoritarian against Ukraine. Now let's discuss a hypothetical situation where Harris would have started WW3 with nukes."

democrats: "we are violating the Geneva Conventions, murdering civilians with missles to destroy our "enemies", blowing up drug smugglers on drug boats (yes they did this back in the day, before they got complaints), starting a "war" with many nations and attempting to side with other nations. Now let's discuss a fact based situation, where harry s truman (a democrat) nuked japan and claimed it was, to "end" ww2".

but sure, now a days, TDS is the main focus, because history doesnt matter to some and they will never learn from it.

have a nice day