安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



You really can't imagine someone asking someone else something? I knew OT was antisocial, but gott damn
I care less about the philosophy of Absurdism and more about my expectations being let down. I expected a lot more from the book which won the Nobel prize in literature. I don't know what I expected. Maybe advice? A recipe? Not just "Choose to be happy, even in the face of insurmountable suffering"
The book has a lot of interesting thoughts, some comedic jabs at other philosophers, but overall I feel like it said less than it ought to have
I think I just got your prison-blood pumping because you ~feel~ inferior by comparison rather than anything I said about myself or anyone else
You ought to introspect
It's been years since I read it, but does Camus include the trick the gods played? That all Sisyphus must do is get the boulder up to the top, climb on top of it, and then reach the exit of the underworld.
No, I don't remember anything like that -- and I didn't even know about that
I also find it lacking in regards to time. I can imagine Sisyphus happy for an instance or two -- but for eternity? I find that doubtful. I'm sure Sisyphus ~could~ be happy, but I doubt its longevity, and that's where I find myself