安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



exhibit a: The appendix.
exhibit b: Nipples on men.
There are others.
zero design, 100pc evolution.
A = Modern science has identified a biological function of the appendix - it is not vestigial, but produces extra digestive enzymes.
B = The fact that men have small vestigial nipples are due to the fact that as DNA programs amino acids into biological forms in a certain controlled order you get life forms going through similar stages, so when you were in embryonic form the genetic based decision to be male or female had not occurred yet, so you start building as both male and female - hence mans nipples. Also, this is science that supports ID.
And it isn't as if this place will soon get a flood of religious bait threads from a bunch of suspicious accounts. No, it won't be the same few bots, shills and banned regulars coming back with endless disposable accounts looking to disrupt the place.
That sort of thing never happens...
There's nothing to suggest any intelligent design to human beings as a species and although I'm not biologist, I've seen at least a few of them show that we are more a mess than anything.
That's some real intelligent design right there. And aging? F**king A. Dementia, arthritis, and incontinence ruining the quality of your life long before you are dead. That's peak design.
More like stupid design.
There was also a breakthrough in our understanding of Whale cells, I believe and something to do with cellular repair vs humans. Whale cells actually repair much better than ours do when they're split.
I can't recall the exact details, but it certainly doesn't point to intelligent design
Your second paragraph is modern systematic poisoning which you've taken as natural.