所有讨论 > Steam 论坛 > Off Topic > 主题详情
Intelligent Design is the One True Religion.
Because it's science based knowing; it affirms the foundation of most religions - it's universally true and simply claims an Intelligent agent(s) has created life.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaVmPMrk1iI
(The Proofs of God's Existence Documentary Full Length)

I'm 99.9 % certain life was created on this planet in carbon based biological forms millennia +/- ago and has most likely been modified and evolved both purposefully and naturally since the beginning. And I'm very grateful for every breathe I have.

I'm 99.9 % sure an even older life has been created in the form of silicon based biology - these take the form of what is commonly described as the grey aliens.

For straight-up, word-up, I do swear - my head was suddenly up and I saw the very clouds roll backwards at the same time my body was compelled to step quickly backwards - I heard a voice tell me about a certain type of biological entity as shown to me described as "trespassers" and later sounds very much like 'everybody's just getting along out there' - it's like it's just us now, doing us with all our petty differences, being babies like not ready for anything right..

In same cases it could even be the very same guy, by any other name - it could be the same crowd or Gods or perhaps even aliens. Either-way God / creator(s) are very much real. And maybe it's not meant to be adversarial, but more a stepping stone of development - it's maybe like a test; can't we just get along with your neighbours despite petty differences?
最后由 𝓁 λ 𝓂 𝒷 𝒹 𝒶🎄 编辑于; 11 月 29 日 上午 1:43
< >
正在显示第 1 - 15 条,共 37 条留言
KaveMan 11 月 29 日 上午 1:52 
By definition they are called fanatics.
This is what Religion deals with; God; Gods; creator; creators; angels; demons etc..
intelligent design?

exhibit a: The appendix.
exhibit b: Nipples on men.

There are others.

zero design, 100pc evolution.
intelligent design?

exhibit a: The appendix.
exhibit b: Nipples on men.

There are others.

zero design, 100pc evolution.

A = Modern science has identified a biological function of the appendix - it is not vestigial, but produces extra digestive enzymes.

B = The fact that men have small vestigial nipples are due to the fact that as DNA programs amino acids into biological forms in a certain controlled order you get life forms going through similar stages, so when you were in embryonic form the genetic based decision to be male or female had not occurred yet, so you start building as both male and female - hence mans nipples. Also, this is science that supports ID.
Acyoax 11 月 29 日 上午 2:19 
A lot of this stuff is not mutually exclusive. Transplanted ontology as a social behavior seems to be a highly potent poison.
Nay even the ion exchange of cellular function is the ultimate chicken and egg scenario - and is very much irreducibly complex.
Apollo702 11 月 29 日 上午 2:24 
Oh it's a religion alright.

And it isn't as if this place will soon get a flood of religious bait threads from a bunch of suspicious accounts. No, it won't be the same few bots, shills and banned regulars coming back with endless disposable accounts looking to disrupt the place.

That sort of thing never happens...
Day 1 11 月 29 日 上午 2:25 
Removing nipples from men would be more trouble than it's worth. Point goes to God in this round.
intelligent design?

exhibit a: The appendix.
exhibit b: Nipples on men.

There are others.

zero design, 100pc evolution.

A = Modern science has identified a biological function of the appendix - it is not vestigial, but produces extra digestive enzymes.

B = The fact that men have small vestigial nipples are due to the fact that as DNA programs amino acids into biological forms in a certain controlled order you get life forms going through similar stages, so when you were in embryonic form the genetic based decision to be male or female had not occurred yet, so you start building as both male and female - hence mans nipples. Also, this is science that supports ID.
e v o l u t I o n
datCookie 11 月 29 日 上午 2:48 
There is no proof of God's existence, because even the Catholic Church has come out and openly admitted that the existence of God "cannot be proven or demonstrated, it can only be known."

There's nothing to suggest any intelligent design to human beings as a species and although I'm not biologist, I've seen at least a few of them show that we are more a mess than anything.
apathy 11 月 29 日 上午 2:50 
I'm so glad unlike whales our digestive and respiratory tracts are connected so I can choke to death.

That's some real intelligent design right there. And aging? F**king A. Dementia, arthritis, and incontinence ruining the quality of your life long before you are dead. That's peak design.

More like stupid design.
datCookie 11 月 29 日 上午 3:00 
引用自 apathy
I'm so glad unlike whales our digestive and respiratory tracts are connected so I can choke to death.

That's some real intelligent design right there. And aging? F**king A. Dementia, arthritis, and incontinence ruining the quality of your life long before you are dead. That's peak design.

More like stupid design.

There was also a breakthrough in our understanding of Whale cells, I believe and something to do with cellular repair vs humans. Whale cells actually repair much better than ours do when they're split.

I can't recall the exact details, but it certainly doesn't point to intelligent design
Namsan 11 月 29 日 上午 3:00 
If I were the god and created the humans by myself, I would make them gorilla-like and have 100 eyes and arms, so they will be the strongest species even without tools or weapons.
Walach 11 月 29 日 上午 3:03 
Whenever I think of Intelligent Design, I think of this documentory:
Judgment Day: Intelligent Design On Trial (creationism vs evolution)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2xyrel-2vI
:P
Acyoax 11 月 29 日 上午 3:07 
引用自 apathy
I'm so glad unlike whales our digestive and respiratory tracts are connected so I can choke to death.

That's some real intelligent design right there. And aging? F**king A. Dementia, arthritis, and incontinence ruining the quality of your life long before you are dead. That's peak design.

More like stupid design.
Got a better idea?

Your second paragraph is modern systematic poisoning which you've taken as natural.
最后由 Acyoax 编辑于; 11 月 29 日 上午 3:09
< >
正在显示第 1 - 15 条,共 37 条留言
每页显示数: 1530 50

所有讨论 > Steam 论坛 > Off Topic > 主题详情