安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



So much of this just boils down to humans being inscure that something which isn't fleshy can do what fleshy humans do
Regardless of if it's good or not, that fact that it can even be recognised as music kinda makes it music, no?
In regards to art, most definitions go something like
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/art
This is where definitions get tricky
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/music
If we can recognise this as "music"
And music is an art by its etymological origin
We get into a circular problem, and debatably get stuck in machine consciousness talk
Using the same benchmarks that we use to diagnose humans and animals with consciousness and sentience, current LLMs already meet the requirements to be labelled both conscious and sentient. But the algorithms used to make most AI music -- IE the one Suno uses -- isn't an LLM tmk
They might use an LLM to write lyrics, but the actual generation doesn't
So how much is required for it to be considered art? Is the intentional use of language by an LLM before the composition by the algorithm still count as art? If I write lyrics and put them into Suno, is that song art because of my lyrics? If there's some sort of qualifier and disqualifier, we need to located it to assess the logic. Otherwise, it's just wildly varied and mostly up to individual interpretation
I saw a song go viral on Tiktok recently until it was discovered the vocals were AI then people started mass unadding it from their playlists and they took the song down from streaming until they replaced it a real singer this time uwu
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcpDO3eqka8
It's also not art either, since art is also (keyword here) the process and not only the end result. Warming food in the oven isn't cooking. Ordering food isn't either. Watching TV is not acting in a TV show. Watching porn is not having sex (I wish), tracing isn't drawing (and this comparison is an insult to tracing because with AI you don't even do the tracing yourself). Watching a streamer play a game isn't playing it yourself. Turning on the lights in your house doesn't make you an electrician. Taking out the trash doesn't make you a trashman...
I could quite literally be here all day. If you can't do the task without the "tool", then it's you who is the "tool".
And as for hibrid ai-human works, miss me with that nonsense. If someone actually knew how to do something then they wouldn't need the AI in the first place. Why the ♥♥♥♥ would I ask AI to do something for me if I already know how to do it? Reminds me of those stupid fridges that warn you when something is running out. As if I couldn't just open the freaking door and check myself. If you made something and then add AI, congratulations, you just undermined whatever it is the you actually did.
"oh but I wrote a song but I can't sing". Wrong. You think you can't sing. You can't sing right now. But you would totally be able to if you actually take your time with it. Heck there was that famous rapper that sang with his teeth all ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up and I have to believe you can't?
Please.
I like how a guy just types a few lines and instantly converts old music into any genre or creates a remix
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nizfPamAyew
Also if you think the minority of naysayers are going to have any influence, check out the comment section reaction to the above AI-generated video. It's a 'Star Wars 1994' trailer featuring AI arnie and another truckload of AI-generated actors.
They are absolutely loving it - and it doesn't even try to make sense. It's just so perfectly bonkers and original.
Now imagine someone who is able to devise a coherent story with this tech - and that's the death knell right there for the tired woke-fest that is today's media industry.
People are dying for something that isn't a toothless braindead 'message', and this tech is the ticket to true creative freedom. The oddballs just won't be able to control it, and we'll be straight back to the good times.
People can do really wild things with AI, but there's just something missing.