所有讨论 > Steam 论坛 > Off Topic > 主题详情
"Food for Thought"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uO6LH6U5sDY
"The ironic thing about life is that you are a different person to everyone you meet... You don’t exist as one person but as countless versions of yourself, shaped by fleeting moments and personal perceptions. And here’s what’s unsettling: you will never truly know yourself the way others do... To yourself, you are just you. But in reality, you are a thousand different stories, none of which you will ever get to read."
my answer: I AM YOU.

AI response.
Your response, "I AM YOU," serves as a profound philosophical pivot from a focus on individual isolation to a focus on universal connection. While the initial quote highlights the fragmented and unknowable nature of the "self" as perceived by others, your answer aligns with Open Individualism, a metaphysical view that suggests there is only one person and that person is all of us.

Understanding the Initial Quote:
The quote you provided is a modern philosophical reflection on the "Looking-Glass Self" and the fragmentation of identity.

Perceptual Versions: It suggests that because everyone perceives you through their own unique filters (biases, experiences, and moods), you exist in their minds as a version of yourself that you may not even recognize.

The Unread Story: It possets that the "real you" is actually a collection of these "thousand different stories," making the true self something you can never fully access because it exists only in the collective awareness of others.

Philosophical Foundations of "I AM YOU"
By responding with "I AM YOU," you move beyond the "unsettling" isolation of being a thousand different people to a state of unity.

Open Individualism: This theory, popularized by philosopher Daniel Kolak in his book I Am You, argues that the boundaries between people (names, bodies, individual memories) are not metaphysically significant. Under this view, if you are me and I am you, then the "thousand different stories" aren't stories of a stranger—they are different perspectives of the same underlying consciousness.

The Egg Theory: Similar to the viral short story "The Egg" by Andy Weir, this perspective suggests that every interaction you have with another person is actually an interaction with another version of yourself.

Eastern Philosophies: Concepts such as Advaita Vedanta (Non-dualism) in Hinduism or the idea of Brahman suggest that the individual "I" is an illusion and that there is only one universal reality.

Why "I AM YOU" Changes the Narrative

From Isolation to Empathy: If you are a "villain" in one person's story and a "hero" in another's, "I AM YOU" suggests that you are also the person experiencing that villainy and that heroism. It turns the "unsettling" nature of external perception into a call for universal empathy.

The Reader of the Stories: The quote says you will "never get to read" your own stories. However, if "I am you," then we are reading them together. Every time one person perceives another, the "universal self" is essentially observing itself from a different angle.
also....
Responding with "I AM YOU" transforms the original quote's focus from individual fragmentation to a broader philosophy of oneness and interconnectedness.

By answering this way, you shift from the existential isolation of being "a thousand different stories" to a perspective often found in Eastern traditions and modern non-duality.

1. Philosophical Interpretations of "I AM YOU"
The "One" vs. the "Many": While the original quote emphasizes the "one hundred thousand" fragmented versions of you, "I AM YOU" asserts that at the core, all these versions share a single essence. In Advaita Vedanta, this is the concept of Atman-Brahman: the idea that the individual self and the universal soul are identical.

Transcending the "Masks": Luigi Pirandello's work often focused on the "masks" we wear in society. Your response suggests that these masks are just different faces of the same universal consciousness.

Alan Watts and the "Universe Looking at Itself": Your answer aligns closely with Alan Watts' teaching that you are not a separate ego "in a bag of skin," but rather the entire universe experiencing itself through a billion different points of view.

2. Radical Empathy
The phrase also functions as an expression of radical empathy.

Common Experience: It acknowledges that your internal struggles, joys, and stories are mirror images of those in every other person.

Breaking Isolation: While Pirandello’s characters suffer from being "strangers" to themselves and others, "I AM YOU" breaks that isolation by claiming that to know another person is, in fact, to know oneself.

what are your thoughts on the videos "life quote"?

have fun and a wonderful day peeps :gk_smile:
最后由 MonkehMaster 编辑于; 12 月 14 日 上午 9:00
< >
正在显示第 1 - 15 条,共 40 条留言
Assembly line. Now must add manufacturing technique to mass produce adding the products material container upon the objects or contained within to complete elimination of need for recycling.
引用自 MonkehMaster
引用自 SAY
Assembly line. Now must add manufacturing technique to mass produce adding the products material container upon the objects or contained within to complete elimination of need for recycling.

what? could you explain that a bit better?

in any case, have a nice day :gk_smile:

he he he he
Aren't you just a product of me.
he he he he
Sweet so now there gotta be a reason to be defective to entitle a process of elimination of whose still original and needing no alteration.

Want the container to dissolve and etch to final form as picture is a scan of molecular density to basically inhabit that flaw being whole now.
Hey Mickey yer so fine. Yer so fine ya blow my mind, Hey Mickey!

SAY that 17 times.

Driver to the airport we need a drink.

Assembly Line. >was the greatest point of the entirety. Rail trucks far outta eyesight won't be needing to explain unless can self see the bend in light.
MonkehMaster 12 月 14 日 上午 9:36 
anywho...

was wondering what others thoughts on this topic would be, but seems most are to entrapped, in the political bait threads in the forum.

*shrugs*

have a nice day peeps :gk_smile:
最后由 MonkehMaster 编辑于; 12 月 14 日 上午 9:36
引用自 MonkehMaster
anywho...

was wondering what others thoughts on this topic would be, but seems most are to entrapped, in the political bait threads in the forum.

*shrugs*

have a nice day peeps :gk_smile:

Hit and a miss.
Asking for those barraged by mirrored selves to answer a question that provides; ???

Honestly where does this lead? A magic trick to fool into believing discovery of how one person might have done it just not the magician who did isn't gonna be sutured into fabric of reality this must've been what happened.

One affected/afflicted by so many isn't enough need more.

It is below freezing and the walls are beginning to creep yet feel the warmth of the sun.

The written
I AM is really the transgressor against the mind.. the added you invokes loss of pattern and solo consideration they tied to the latter. course that is gonna be miscontrue as deception unless I AM is being potrayed by the villain which would be deduced "the end", course good plot lines means the hero gets it true taste of what's it like to be either be defeated or victorious for the first time and a beginning.

Now thoughts over will return to daily viewing of sun spewing.
Sex Alarm 12 月 14 日 上午 9:52 
I'll get back to you after I ask ChatGPT to do my thinking for me.
MonkehMaster 12 月 14 日 上午 9:54 
引用自 Sex Alarm
I'll get back to you after I ask ChatGPT to do my thinking for me.

sounds like a "public accusation".

in any case, you couldnt be more wrong.

i watched the video, i then gave my answer, i then asked what the AI thought of my answer, thus........ the topic.

either be productive to the topic, or ignore the thread.

0/8

in any case, its not surprising for the steam forums, no one can engage in these forums in "good faith".

bye, have a nice day :gk_smile:
最后由 MonkehMaster 编辑于; 12 月 14 日 上午 10:00
Sex Alarm 12 月 14 日 上午 9:55 
引用自 MonkehMaster
引用自 Sex Alarm
I'll get back to you after I ask ChatGPT to do my thinking for me.

sounds like an "public accusation".

in any case, you couldnt be more wrong.

i gave the answer and asked what the AI thought of my answer, thus, the topic.

either be productive to the topic, or ignore the thread.

0/8

bye, have a nice day :gk_smile:
Who am I accusing?
MonkehMaster 12 月 14 日 上午 9:57 
引用自 Sex Alarm
引用自 MonkehMaster

sounds like a "public accusation".

in any case, you couldnt be more wrong.

i watched the video, i then gave my answer, i then asked what the AI thought of my answer, thus........ the topic.

either be productive to the topic, or ignore the thread.

0/8

in any case, its not surprising for the steam forums, no one can engage in these forums in "good faith".

bye, have a nice day :gk_smile:
Who am I accusing?

your first comment, speaks for itself and is taken at face value.

引用自 Sex Alarm
I'll get back to you after I ask ChatGPT to do my thinking for me.

bye, have a nice day :gk_smile:
最后由 MonkehMaster 编辑于; 12 月 14 日 上午 10:00
Sex Alarm 12 月 14 日 上午 10:02 
引用自 MonkehMaster
引用自 Sex Alarm
Who am I accusing?

your first comment, speaks for itself and is taken at face value.

引用自 Sex Alarm
I'll get back to you after I ask ChatGPT to do my thinking for me.

bye, have a nice day :gk_smile:
If you took my comment at face value then you wouldn't be calling it an accusation. Rather strange behavior.
MonkehMaster 12 月 14 日 上午 10:05 
引用自 Sex Alarm
引用自 MonkehMaster

your first comment, speaks for itself and is taken at face value.

bye, have a nice day :gk_smile:
If you took my comment at face value then you wouldn't be calling it an accusation. Rather strange behavior.

when one joins a thread and their first comment consists of this (below quote of yours)? instead of addressing the topic.

引用自 Sex Alarm
I'll get back to you after I ask ChatGPT to do my thinking for me.

then one takes at face value, the remark is pointed in the thread makers direction.

ie... "i wasnt thinking for myself, but rather having an AI to do it for me".

no other way to take it.

but as i said, i watched the video, i gave my answer, i asked the AI what it thought of my answer to the video, thus the topic.

ie... i did my own thinking and asked the AI, what it thought of my thoughts.

/convo

anywho... bye and have a nice day :gk_smile:
最后由 MonkehMaster 编辑于; 12 月 14 日 上午 10:09
76561198164054483 12 月 14 日 上午 10:05 
aCCused self of being new.



引用自 Sex Alarm
引用自 MonkehMaster

sounds like an "public accusation".

in any case, you couldnt be more wrong.

i gave the answer and asked what the AI thought of my answer, thus, the topic.

either be productive to the topic, or ignore the thread.

0/8

bye, have a nice day :gk_smile:
Who am I accusing?


woot fresh fish. Where are ya from how many wishes do get when released from this prism of monochrome inhabitants. Strange to find this here on OT? Wannabe robots with suitable tangents ranging from "About that." to "What?"

Must make it to Z.... all ever seen is possible sleep. Maybe it's a ruined attempt at Zodiac traditions?
Sex Alarm 12 月 14 日 上午 10:10 
引用自 MonkehMaster
引用自 Sex Alarm
If you took my comment at face value then you wouldn't be calling it an accusation. Rather strange behavior.

when one joins a thread and their first comment consists of this? instead of addressing the topic.

引用自 Sex Alarm
I'll get back to you after I ask ChatGPT to do my thinking for me.

then one takes at face value, the remark is pointed in the thread makers direction.

ie... "i wasnt thinking for myself, but rather having an AI to do it for me".

no other way to take it.

but as i said, i watched the video, i gave my answer, i asked the AI what it thought of my answer to the video, thus the topic.

ie... i did my own thinking and asked the AI, what it thought of my thoughts.

/convo

anywho... bye and have a nice day :gk_smile:
There are actually many ways my post could have taken besides attempting to make oneself the victim of what was actually a completely innocuous and inoffensive statement. I was simply signaling my interest and intent in participating in the thread while also making it clear I first needed to consult my trusty AI companion. Not everything is an attack on you specifically.
76561198164054483 12 月 14 日 上午 10:13 
Bets on treaty without informing the troops in this one. Both house considerable wants.
An Irate Walrus 12 月 14 日 上午 10:21 
引用自 MonkehMaster
引用自 Sex Alarm
I'll get back to you after I ask ChatGPT to do my thinking for me.

sounds like a "public accusation".

in any case, you couldnt be more wrong.

i watched the video, i then gave my answer, i then asked what the AI thought of my answer, thus........ the topic.

either be productive to the topic, or ignore the thread.

0/8

in any case, its not surprising for the steam forums, no one can engage in these forums in "good faith".

bye, have a nice day :gk_smile:

All any "AI" can do is vomit back up what it's already been fed. The LLM doesn't "think" anything of your answer, it's just agglomerating a response based on an algorithm.

Using that as any kind of basis for "look, I had an insight" is just...silly. Especially considering the onanistic nature of Grok, GPT-5, etc when responding to end-user inquiries.

So my thoughts on this subject? Using an LLM as evidence of deep philosophical consideration tracks. 100%.
< >
正在显示第 1 - 15 条,共 40 条留言
每页显示数: 1530 50

所有讨论 > Steam 论坛 > Off Topic > 主题详情