安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



he he he he
Aren't you just a product of me.
he he he he
Sweet so now there gotta be a reason to be defective to entitle a process of elimination of whose still original and needing no alteration.
Want the container to dissolve and etch to final form as picture is a scan of molecular density to basically inhabit that flaw being whole now.
SAY that 17 times.
Driver to the airport we need a drink.
Assembly Line. >was the greatest point of the entirety. Rail trucks far outta eyesight won't be needing to explain unless can self see the bend in light.
was wondering what others thoughts on this topic would be, but seems most are to entrapped, in the political bait threads in the forum.
*shrugs*
have a nice day peeps
Hit and a miss.
Asking for those barraged by mirrored selves to answer a question that provides; ???
Honestly where does this lead? A magic trick to fool into believing discovery of how one person might have done it just not the magician who did isn't gonna be sutured into fabric of reality this must've been what happened.
One affected/afflicted by so many isn't enough need more.
It is below freezing and the walls are beginning to creep yet feel the warmth of the sun.
The written
I AM is really the transgressor against the mind.. the added you invokes loss of pattern and solo consideration they tied to the latter. course that is gonna be miscontrue as deception unless I AM is being potrayed by the villain which would be deduced "the end", course good plot lines means the hero gets it true taste of what's it like to be either be defeated or victorious for the first time and a beginning.
Now thoughts over will return to daily viewing of sun spewing.
sounds like a "public accusation".
in any case, you couldnt be more wrong.
i watched the video, i then gave my answer, i then asked what the AI thought of my answer, thus........ the topic.
either be productive to the topic, or ignore the thread.
0/8
in any case, its not surprising for the steam forums, no one can engage in these forums in "good faith".
bye, have a nice day
your first comment, speaks for itself and is taken at face value.
bye, have a nice day
when one joins a thread and their first comment consists of this (below quote of yours)? instead of addressing the topic.
then one takes at face value, the remark is pointed in the thread makers direction.
ie... "i wasnt thinking for myself, but rather having an AI to do it for me".
no other way to take it.
but as i said, i watched the video, i gave my answer, i asked the AI what it thought of my answer to the video, thus the topic.
ie... i did my own thinking and asked the AI, what it thought of my thoughts.
/convo
anywho... bye and have a nice day
woot fresh fish. Where are ya from how many wishes do get when released from this prism of monochrome inhabitants. Strange to find this here on OT? Wannabe robots with suitable tangents ranging from "About that." to "What?"
Must make it to Z.... all ever seen is possible sleep. Maybe it's a ruined attempt at Zodiac traditions?
All any "AI" can do is vomit back up what it's already been fed. The LLM doesn't "think" anything of your answer, it's just agglomerating a response based on an algorithm.
Using that as any kind of basis for "look, I had an insight" is just...silly. Especially considering the onanistic nature of Grok, GPT-5, etc when responding to end-user inquiries.
So my thoughts on this subject? Using an LLM as evidence of deep philosophical consideration tracks. 100%.