安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



So it depends were you sit upon that spectrum. All child prodigies have a linkage to autism in their family. It's why they can focus in depth on certain topics of interest.
Then you have others like Albert Einstein, who would of been labelled to have Autism by today standards of testing.
Most with Autism have a brain overloading with too much information and details for their body to cope with. Sensory overload. Some learn to control that and use it to their advantage.
For example: I suggesting watching great movies like Baby Driver and The Accountant.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBfsgcswlYQ
If you need help in your everyday life, it's a disability, period. I don't even understand why peoples may even argue about that. Of course it's a disorder.
Sorry, I don't play your "hierarchy of oppression" games.
"Awwwwwwwww here (we) goooooooo!!!"
...but before I get torn apart, please know I am a psychologist who has devoted his life and career to better the lives of those on the autism spectrum. I love the population, and I love my work.
That being said...I know of this issue very well. Autism is 1000% a disorder...not a different way of thinking or anything like that. It is a spectrum, so you will have your "higher functioning" individuals, and those that need more assistance. I have seen both sides - the kids who just need assistance with understanding social cues, as well as the individuals who cannot thrive in the natural environment without assistance.
The neurodiversity movement means well, but they are more than likely doing more harm than good. They are pushing to remove autism as a disability, as they believe it's just a different way of thinking. This can't be farther from the truth. One of my favorite articles (Shields & Beversdorf, 2021) delve into this issue. Per the DSM-V, symptoms of ASD include not understanding non-vocal social cues. The article explains three situations where this has created serious issues for autistic adults.
For instance, one case mentioned an autistic gentleman who went to a job interview. When he first arrived, the female interviewer smiled at him, shook his hand, and would laugh softly at some of his jokes. The autistic gentleman took these signs as romantic affection and began stalking the woman - a serious crime. He was arrested, but released right after when the situation was explained.
So here is where the neurodiversity movement is going to mess up. If they succeed with removing autism as a disorder, autistic individuals will be tried as "neurotypical" in such situations as the one above. Part of proving someone's guilt is intention...but if the person does not realize what they are doing is wrong, it will not matter.
The hard truth is that not every environment will want to modify itself to accommodate the autistic community, That takes time and effort that some do not have. Like everyone else in the world, we should be teaching these individuals to adapt to the environment. We are all expected to adapt to whatever environment we are in. Let's give autistic individuals the dignity they deserve.
Reference:
Shields, K., & Beversdorf, D. (2021). A Dilemma For Neurodiversity. Neuroethics, 14(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-020-09431-x
Is it? Here i would have to assume the OP is a bit sensitive.
No i can´t, shouldn´t say what´s what with it since i´m no expert on anything, it´s very important if it´s called a disorder or a "need some help´er"?
Whatever possesses people to make these threads fishing for validation is also a disorder.
But if its not harmful to the individual or others its just treated as variation of life.