所有讨论 > Steam 论坛 > Off Topic > 主题详情
angus 12 月 11 日 上午 4:00
I think that current aircraft should use twin-rotor helicopters to carry passengers, so that they won't keep rushing forward, like the CH-47 Chinook.
I think that current aircraft should use twin-rotor helicopters to carry passengers, so that they won't keep rushing forward, like the CH-47 Chinook.
< >
正在显示第 1 - 4 条,共 4 条留言
Maverick 12 月 11 日 上午 4:05 
The cost and frequency of maintaining airplanes is way less than helicopters, and most importantly, they are way safer.

If both engines of a plane fall off, a plane can float for miles to the nearest airport. If you lose a helicopter blade or go into an out of control spin, everyone is dead.
shoopy 12 月 11 日 上午 4:09 
Twin rotors are super high maintenance and require strict checks to keep running properly. The more we have of them, the more likely a screwup is going to happen, not to mention the cost.
cramb 12 月 11 日 下午 3:46 
I agree that current aircraft should use twin-rotor helicopters to carry passengers, so that they won't keep rushing forward, like the CH-47 Chinook.
a loud pop 12 月 11 日 下午 3:49 
I agree that all aircraft should crash like the the v-22 osprey especially when carrying marines
< >
正在显示第 1 - 4 条,共 4 条留言
每页显示数: 1530 50

所有讨论 > Steam 论坛 > Off Topic > 主题详情