安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



I'm not making this up.
These are official statistics.
Unlike China, the US did not offer much to the people eking out a living around the poverty line. Per head, the US’s economic output is six times China’s, and yet, inexplicably, there seem to be more abjectly poor Americans than Chinese.
The story of US inequality is known by now. It is nonetheless breathtaking how its lopsided distribution of income keeps getting worse. In 1980, the income of Americans in the middle of the income distribution added up to a bit more than 52.5% of the income of those perched at the top 90th percentile. At the turn of the century, it was 48%. By 2023, it had slipped further, to 42.5%.
Burying your head in the sand and pretending that they are false doesn't change that they are fact.
More than 3.5 billion in the world live on less than $7 per day. Americans are doing pretty prettty good on a relative basis. Yay Constitution. Yay free market capitalism.
The poor’s share of the US economic pie is shrinking to developing-world levels. The income of Americans in the top 90th percentile of wealth grew more than twice as fast between 2000 and 2023 as that of Americans in the bottom 10th percentile. These days, Americans in the poorest 10th of the population draw about 1.8% of the nation’s income, about the same as poor Bolivians. In Nigeria, they reap 3%, in China 3.1%, in Bangladesh 3.7%.
This is not to congratulate China for its authoritarian government, for its repression of minorities or for the iron fist it deploys against any form of dissent. But it merits pondering how this undemocratic government could successfully slash its poverty rate when the richest and oldest democracy in the world wouldn’t.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/_H4vwkGvWjE
have we forgotten the last 3 or 4 decades (or more)?
"the more you know"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ygs3IHJ2bM
anywho, have a nice day
He knows. This is just bait. Nobody even attempting to be honest think any Americans live on $90 a month. That wouldn't even cover groceries for a week.
agreed
that barely covers an internet bill (we talking just internet as well), wont cover rent/mortgage/etc.. (wouldnt even cover a yearly property tax), utilities (including cell), food for 4 weeks, gas back and forth from work, etc.. etc..
if you have kids? welp... add more expenses.
among many other things, insurance (health or otherwise), as well as accidents, repairs, or any other unexpected spending.
$90 a month, would keep me fed, while living in a box, on the side of (or in) a random abandoned building... i would hope.
that said, OP didnt even bother providing links for the claims.
have a nice day
They are not disputing your claims. They are asking why do you have are "hard on" for all things US?
The USA is something different entirely. I do not know all the reasons because unlike China I've never lived in the USA. I would imagine it is wage stagnation and a decline in jobs. The decline brought about by the corporations exporting the work to China, Mexico, India etc. It is not a Trump policy this has been happening for a long time.
2, social credit score. The oligarchs relaxed with the greed, and gave up a little bit of wealth, in exchange for stripping everyone of any privacy. "You've been a good boy, no jay walking or anything, have some discounted food prices!"
3, they dont respect copyright, unless their government owns it. They steal trade secrets, and let black markets thrive.
4, they threaten direct war any time a nation tries to impose tariffs, or do anything to even trade.