安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



_SQUEAL_
From a business point of view if someone pays you 100,000,000 dollars to play ads of them then you gotta take it.
Are the adverts the engine that sells the "entertainment?"
maybe instead they give us something useful instead detrimental to our wealth?
useful to prolong our lives?
useful to give our loved ones a chance at surviving this pronounced advert society?
or just a chance to smile.....
without another humans judgement......
Companies have always been in it for profit, obviously, but today more than ever, companies are more shameless and run solely by the CFO, who only sees things according to the bottom line and who has to answer to and provide for investors who REALLY only see things according to the bottom line and profits.
That's the world we live in today. Don't expect it to get better.
They own all the media journos too, so when some garbage game/movie/series they overhype fails and there's tons of backlash, they profit from the attention either way.
what the *bleep* are you but the bot that says WE can not.