安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



Mr Trump and many of his sycophants promote fascist idealogies. The idealogies have to be scrutinized, and laws created to prevent these actions.
It does not mean, one cannot speak of fascist idealogies. It does not mean they will not be allowed to be spoke or shown in public discourse. We do have Freedoms of Speech protections.
But premisies of white supremacy, the use of troops in cities, talk of abridging the constitution running for third terms, talks of Insurrection Acts whilst no insurrection, judges abridging our freedoms against Posse Comitatus laws, all should be deemed fasco manifesto, and those should be immediately charged and removed from office. Or prevented from running or nomination.
Being a fascist is not illegal.
The Nazis were not prosecuted at Nuremberg for being Fascists.
They were prosecuted for murdering people and committing war crimes.
Political murder can happen under any political ideology. Just look ANTIFA and how it attempted to murder Andy Ngo and many others and is radicalising people to commit murder.
My contention is that is should be. We fought a war and millions have died and were unalived.
The fact the war is over, should not mean these are not treasonous idealogies. They are.
Why do democrats hate the military?
name one
They were scrutinised, by the American people and the American people chose to return Donald Trump to the US Presidency.
What promises would those be?
That would be the National Guard. Who are there to be deployed in cities which are out of control, in this case, with crime. There have been double digit percentage drops in the rate of crime in every city the National Guard has been deployed to and polls show massive support from the populations of those cities for this.
This amendment was only brought in in 1947. What precisely is the argument against unamending it? FDR had three terms.
Examples?
Well thank God you're not in charge of anything then.
And if you want to be, put it in a manifesto and run for President.
As was said, its not the thought, but the action.
FDR is literally the argument against allowing more than 2 terms.