安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Sucks to need to find new employment in the short-term, but getting rid of these sweat shop jobs is a long-term win.
This is the exact mentality lawmakers had when they shipped factory jobs to China to begin with. Now they want them back. The solution isn't to just cut the jobs, but to regulate Amazon so it's a less hostile work environment instead.
Amazon could keep prices low by cutting their huge mark up. The reason Amazon couldn't compete with things like Temu is because Temu had very little mark up compared to Amazon.
It would be an amazing thing if there was other jobs available for the people who work there. People work there fully knowing it's abusive because there is no other jobs available that pay a living wage.
Thirty cents matters to Amazon because they fulfill like a billion orders a day probably but they literally just told me I'm gonna save about a dollar a month as consolation for laying off half a million people.
So it's probably a real figure that they just think is a bigger deal than it is.
The real figure is they will save is millions getting rid of the employees as the average Amazon warehouse job pays 18 usd an hour.